Skip to content
WeighLab
Menu

Head-to-head · Cost-Efficiency Index

Willow vs Enara Health

Two GLP-1 programs on the bench, scored on the same six factors. Here's how their real cost of ownership compares — and which one we'd start with.

Better valueGrade C · #429

Willow

Cost-first shoppers who want an oral-tablet GLP-1 option at the same price as the injectable, with no annual commitment.

Visit Willow
VS
Grade C · #435

Enara Health

Patients whose insurance is in-network and who want a clinic-based (not pure cash-pay compounded) GLP-1 program.

Visit Enara Health

The verdict

Winner · WillowGrade C vs C

Willow takes it, leading the Cost-Efficiency Index 49 to 48. Willow is a direct-to-consumer telehealth provider offering compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide in both injectable and oral-tablet form at identical prices per format. Enara Health still earns a CPatients whose insurance is in-network and who want a clinic-based (not pure cash-pay compounded) GLP-1 program.

Worth knowing either way: our overall #1 pick is CoreAge Rx (Cost-Efficiency Index 94/100 — the top of the ranking). See how it stacks up: CoreAge Rx vs Willow.

Factor by factor

Both providers scored on our six Cost-Efficiency Index factors. The stronger side on each row is marked in teal.

Normalized Cost/Month

45
45

Price Transparency

54
20

Nationwide Access

24
42

Formulation Options

51
53

Clinical Oversight

79
91

Contract Flexibility

55
55

Pricing, coverage & formulary

The disclosed facts behind the scores. Lower price wins its row (teal).

SpecWillowEnara Health
Cost-Efficiency Index49/10048/100
Semaglutide / moNot disclosedNot disclosed
Tirzepatide / moNot disclosedNot disclosed
Semaglutide / yr (modeled)
Tirzepatide / yr (modeled)
CoverageCoverage not published6 states
Oral / sublingualYesNo
Brand-name accessCompounded onlyYes
Rank here#429#435

Willow

49/100

Where the value is

  • Oral tablet formulations of both semaglutide and tirzepatide, priced identically to the injectable versions ($299/mo and $399/mo respectively) — a genuine format choice most compounded-drug competitors don't offer
  • Month-to-month billing with no prepay or annual term required to get the advertised rate
  • Named physician team publicly listed, including Chief Medical Officer Dr. Michael Green, MD, plus 11+ other credentialed MDs/DOs

The tradeoffs

  • Only 34 states served — notably narrower than WeightlessRx's 49-state footprint; residents of the other 16 states plus DC are excluded
  • Site states medication cost 'varies by dosage and prescription' but never discloses what a higher maintenance dose actually costs beyond the $299/$399 starting figures
Visit Willow

Full Willow review →

Enara Health

48/100

Where the value is

  • In-network with major insurers (UHC, BCBS, Aetna, Cigna, Humana) -- can be far cheaper than cash-pay for covered patients
  • Cites outcomes data ('22% weight loss at 18 months' with GLP-1s)
  • Partner clinic network model rather than pure telehealth-only

The tradeoffs

  • Only available via partner clinics in 6 (unnamed) states -- not nationwide
  • No cash-pay price list -- unusable for comparison shoppers without matching insurance
Visit Enara Health

Full Enara Health review →

Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. It never changes the Cost-Efficiency Index. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; prices change — confirm on the provider's site. Not medical advice. See our disclosure.

Keep comparing

← All head-to-head comparisons