Skip to content
WeighLab
Menu

Head-to-head · Cost-Efficiency Index

Enara Health vs Omnia TeleHealth

Two GLP-1 programs on the bench, scored on the same six factors. Here's how their real cost of ownership compares — and which one we'd start with.

Better valueGrade C · #435

Enara Health

Patients whose insurance is in-network and who want a clinic-based (not pure cash-pay compounded) GLP-1 program.

Visit Enara Health
VS
Grade C · #440

Omnia TeleHealth

Patients wanting one telehealth provider for weight loss plus other general/urgent-care needs.

Visit Omnia TeleHealth

The verdict

Too close to callGrade C vs C

Enara Health and Omnia TeleHealth tie on the Cost-Efficiency Index at 48/100, so neither wins outright on the numbers. For most shoppers we'd start with Enara Health (ranked #435, a hair above #440) — Patients whose insurance is in-network and who want a clinic-based (not pure cash-pay compounded) GLP-1 program. But Omnia TeleHealth is a genuine coin-flip alternative here.

Worth knowing either way: our overall #1 pick is CoreAge Rx (Cost-Efficiency Index 94/100 — the top of the ranking). See how it stacks up: CoreAge Rx vs Enara Health.

Factor by factor

Both providers scored on our six Cost-Efficiency Index factors. The stronger side on each row is marked in teal.

Normalized Cost/Month

45
45

Price Transparency

20
54

Nationwide Access

42
24

Formulation Options

53
40

Clinical Oversight

91
80

Contract Flexibility

55
55

Pricing, coverage & formulary

The disclosed facts behind the scores. Lower price wins its row (teal).

SpecEnara HealthOmnia TeleHealth
Cost-Efficiency Index48/10048/100
Semaglutide / moNot disclosedNot disclosed
Tirzepatide / moNot disclosedNot disclosed
Semaglutide / yr (modeled)
Tirzepatide / yr (modeled)
Coverage6 statesCoverage not published
Oral / sublingualNoNo
Brand-name accessYesCompounded only
Rank here#435#440

Enara Health

48/100

Where the value is

  • In-network with major insurers (UHC, BCBS, Aetna, Cigna, Humana) -- can be far cheaper than cash-pay for covered patients
  • Cites outcomes data ('22% weight loss at 18 months' with GLP-1s)
  • Partner clinic network model rather than pure telehealth-only

The tradeoffs

  • Only available via partner clinics in 6 (unnamed) states -- not nationwide
  • No cash-pay price list -- unusable for comparison shoppers without matching insurance
Visit Enara Health

Full Enara Health review →

Omnia TeleHealth

48/100

Where the value is

  • Named, verifiable compounding pharmacy partner (Belmar Pharma Solutions)
  • LegitScript certified telehealth provider badge displayed
  • Broad service catalog (70+ conditions) beyond just weight loss

The tradeoffs

  • No actual GLP-1 medication price could be found on the site
  • Full state list not published -- only a count of 17 states given
Visit Omnia TeleHealth

Full Omnia TeleHealth review →

Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. It never changes the Cost-Efficiency Index. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; prices change — confirm on the provider's site. Not medical advice. See our disclosure.

Keep comparing

← All head-to-head comparisons