Skip to content
WeighLab
Menu

Head-to-head · Cost-Efficiency Index

AmberHealth vs AZ Health

Two GLP-1 programs on the bench, scored on the same six factors. Here's how their real cost of ownership compares — and which one we'd start with.

Better valueGrade C · #222

AmberHealth

Cost-first shoppers who want not applicable -- this is an OTC supplement brand, not a GLP-1 prescribing telehealth service.

Visit AmberHealth
VS
Grade C · #223

AZ Health

Cost-first shoppers who want transparent flat-rate compounded GLP-1 pricing in the roughly half of states it covers, if you confirm eligibility first.

Visit AZ Health

The verdict

Too close to callGrade C vs C

AmberHealth and AZ Health tie on the Cost-Efficiency Index at 61/100, so neither wins outright on the numbers. For most shoppers we'd start with AmberHealth (ranked #222, a hair above #223) — Cost-first shoppers who want not applicable -- this is an OTC supplement brand, not a GLP-1 prescribing telehealth service. But AZ Health is a genuine coin-flip alternative here.

Worth knowing either way: our overall #1 pick is CoreAge Rx (Cost-Efficiency Index 94/100 — the top of the ranking). See how it stacks up: CoreAge Rx vs AmberHealth.

Factor by factor

Both providers scored on our six Cost-Efficiency Index factors. The stronger side on each row is marked in teal.

Normalized Cost/Month

45
64

Price Transparency

54
78

Nationwide Access

86
24

Formulation Options

53
77

Clinical Oversight

79
67

Contract Flexibility

55
61

Pricing, coverage & formulary

The disclosed facts behind the scores. Lower price wins its row (teal).

SpecAmberHealthAZ Health
Cost-Efficiency Index61/10061/100
Semaglutide / moNot disclosed$179/mo (starting dose, compounded)
Tirzepatide / moNot disclosed$199/mo (starting dose, compounded)
Semaglutide / yr (modeled)$2,148
Tirzepatide / yr (modeled)$2,388
CoverageAll 50 statesCoverage not published
Oral / sublingualNoYes
Brand-name accessYesCompounded only
Rank here#222#223

AmberHealth

61/100

Where the value is

  • No prescription or clinical intake required to purchase
  • Transparent ingredient list disclosed on the product page
  • Lower price point than prescription GLP-1 programs (as an OTC supplement)

The tradeoffs

  • Does not contain or dispense actual semaglutide or tirzepatide -- a botanical supplement, not a GLP-1 drug
  • Carries the standard FDA 'not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease' disclaimer
Visit AmberHealth

Full AmberHealth review →

AZ Health

61/100

Where the value is

  • Transparent flat monthly pricing published up front — semaglutide from $179/mo, tirzepatide from $199/mo, no insurance required
  • Discloses plainly that compounded medications are not FDA-approved
  • FSA/HSA eligible, free discreet shipping, and cancel-anytime language

The tradeoffs

  • Coverage is stated only as '50% States Covered' with no state list published — you cannot confirm eligibility before starting
  • The.org domain and thin site (an /faq link 404s) are unusual for a commercial telehealth business and warrant extra caution
Visit AZ Health

Full AZ Health review →

Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. It never changes the Cost-Efficiency Index. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; prices change — confirm on the provider's site. Not medical advice. See our disclosure.

Keep comparing

← All head-to-head comparisons