Skip to content
WeighLab
Menu

Head-to-head · Cost-Efficiency Index

NiceRx vs Peter MD

Two GLP-1 programs on the bench, scored on the same six factors. Here's how their real cost of ownership compares — and which one we'd start with.

Better valueGrade C · #50

NiceRx

Cost-first shoppers who want a clearly disclosed standing month-to-month rate rather than a prepay-gated one.

Visit NiceRx
VS
Grade C · #54

Peter MD

Someone who wants a single telehealth account to also cover TRT, hair loss, ED or NAD+ alongside a GLP-1 script, and who will read past the first-month price before budgeting the ongoing cost.

Visit Peter MD

The verdict

Winner · NiceRxGrade C vs C

NiceRx takes it, leading the Cost-Efficiency Index 76 to 72. NiceRx is a compounded GLP-1 telehealth platform charging $199/mo for semaglutide and $299/mo for tirzepatide on an ongoing month-to-month basis (first month discounted to $99 and $199 respectively). Peter MD still earns a CSomeone who wants a single telehealth account to also cover TRT, hair loss, ED or NAD+ alongside a GLP-1 script, and who will read past the first-month price before budgeting the ongoing cost.

Worth knowing either way: our overall #1 pick is CoreAge Rx (Cost-Efficiency Index 94/100 — the top of the ranking). See how it stacks up: CoreAge Rx vs NiceRx.

Factor by factor

Both providers scored on our six Cost-Efficiency Index factors. The stronger side on each row is marked in teal.

Normalized Cost/Month

69
65

Price Transparency

94
74

Nationwide Access

78
68

Formulation Options

66
92

Clinical Oversight

86
75

Contract Flexibility

55
62

Pricing, coverage & formulary

The disclosed facts behind the scores. Lower price wins its row (teal).

SpecNiceRxPeter MD
Cost-Efficiency Index76/10072/100
Semaglutide / mo$199/mo (all doses, compounded)$149/mo first-time (Level 1), $139/mo returning (Level 2)
Tirzepatide / mo$299/mo (all doses, compounded)$149 first month, then $249/mo billed quarterly
Semaglutide / yr (modeled)$2,388$1,788
Tirzepatide / yr (modeled)$3,588$2,988
Coverage46 statesVaries by treatment — excluded in several states (marketing pages list AL/ID; the affiliate program's own disclosure is wider)
Oral / sublingualNoNo
Brand-name accessCompounded onlyCompounded only
Rank here#50#54

NiceRx

76/100

Where the value is

  • Explicitly discloses both the promotional first-month price and the real ongoing 'every month thereafter' rate on the same page, rather than only advertising the promo
  • Flat pricing across all doses, with the provider visit and shipping bundled into the price
  • Cancel-anytime billing with no long-term commitment structure found

The tradeoffs

  • Not available in Alaska, Mississippi, New Jersey, or Kansas
  • Compounded only — no FDA-approved brand option
Visit NiceRx

Full NiceRx review →

Peter MD

72/100

Where the value is

  • Broadest cross-category catalog in this ranking under one account: TRT, ED, non-GLP-1 weight loss, GLP-1 (semaglutide/tirzepatide), men's hair loss and NAD+, plus sermorelin
  • Physician-prescribed, nationwide telehealth brand operating since 2021 (Miami, FL HQ)
  • Sermorelin ($585 for a 12-week supply, ~$195/mo) and NAD+ ($369 for an 8-10 week supply, ~$147-184/mo) sit in the same catalog as the GLP-1 line for anyone consolidating multiple scripts

The tradeoffs

  • Tirzepatide's $149 first-month rate steps up to $249/mo billed quarterly — the number that matters for budgeting is the renewal price, not the headline
  • Semaglutide pricing depends on tier: $149/mo first-time (Level 1) vs $139/mo returning (Level 2), with different total costs ($447 vs $834) over different supply windows, so the all-in cost is not a single number
Visit Peter MD

Full Peter MD review →

Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. It never changes the Cost-Efficiency Index. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; prices change — confirm on the provider's site. Not medical advice. See our disclosure.

Keep comparing

← All head-to-head comparisons