Skip to content
WeighLab
Menu

Head-to-head · Cost-Efficiency Index

Marek Health vs Mint Med

Two GLP-1 programs on the bench, scored on the same six factors. Here's how their real cost of ownership compares — and which one we'd start with.

Better valueGrade C · #329

Marek Health

Cost-first shoppers who want not a fit for this GLP-1 comparison -- best suited to shoppers seeking TRT/hormone optimization, not GLP-1 weight-loss prescribing.

Visit Marek Health
VS
Grade C · #334

Mint Med

Cost-first shoppers who want the simplicity of one flat price across both semaglutide and tirzepatide, in the 35 states it explicitly serves.

Visit Mint Med

The verdict

Winner · Marek HealthGrade C vs C

Marek Health takes it, leading the Cost-Efficiency Index 56 to 55. Marek Health is a well-known hormone-optimization and longevity telehealth brand centered on testosterone replacement therapy, peptides, and supplements. Mint Med still earns a CCost-first shoppers who want the simplicity of one flat price across both semaglutide and tirzepatide, in the 35 states it explicitly serves.

Worth knowing either way: our overall #1 pick is CoreAge Rx (Cost-Efficiency Index 94/100 — the top of the ranking). See how it stacks up: CoreAge Rx vs Marek Health.

Factor by factor

Both providers scored on our six Cost-Efficiency Index factors. The stronger side on each row is marked in teal.

Normalized Cost/Month

45
45

Price Transparency

20
54

Nationwide Access

86
66

Formulation Options

53
40

Clinical Oversight

97
74

Contract Flexibility

55
61

Pricing, coverage & formulary

The disclosed facts behind the scores. Lower price wins its row (teal).

SpecMarek HealthMint Med
Cost-Efficiency Index56/10055/100
Semaglutide / moNot disclosedNot disclosed
Tirzepatide / moNot disclosedNot disclosed
Semaglutide / yr (modeled)
Tirzepatide / yr (modeled)
CoverageAll 50 states36 states
Oral / sublingualNoNo
Brand-name accessYesCompounded only
Rank here#329#334

Marek Health

56/100

Where the value is

  • Established, well-known brand in the hormone-optimization/longevity space
  • Comprehensive lab-based intake process ($299 assessment) rather than a bare online form
  • Broad treatment-goal menu covering multiple health areas

The tradeoffs

  • No evidence of an actual GLP-1/semaglutide/tirzepatide product line despite 'weight loss' being listed as a goal
  • Every guessed GLP-1-related URL path returned 404
Visit Marek Health

Full Marek Health review →

Mint Med

55/100

Where the value is

  • Single, simple flat price ($159/mo) applies to any dose of either drug — no dose-escalation surcharge structure to parse
  • No membership fee ('NO memberships!') and cancellation requires only 48 business hours notice
  • Explicit immediate-refund commitment if a clinical reviewer finds the applicant ineligible

The tradeoffs

  • Payment is collected upfront, before a clinician has reviewed and approved the prescription — patients front the money before knowing they'll be approved
  • Only 35 states are served by name — notably absent are several populous states not on the published list, so most shoppers should check it before assuming eligibility
Visit Mint Med

Full Mint Med review →

Regulatory note: the FDA issued a warning letter to Glow Medispa, LLC dba Mint Med in June 2026. We still list and link to Mint Med; you should know the letter is on the public record before you decide.

Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. It never changes the Cost-Efficiency Index. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; prices change — confirm on the provider's site. Not medical advice. See our disclosure.

Keep comparing

← All head-to-head comparisons