Skip to content
WeighLab
Menu

Head-to-head · Cost-Efficiency Index

LunaRx vs MEDGm

Two GLP-1 programs on the bench, scored on the same six factors. Here's how their real cost of ownership compares — and which one we'd start with.

Better valueGrade C · #187

LunaRx

Shoppers who value simple flat-rate pricing and a no-cost-if-declined guarantee over named clinical credentials.

Visit LunaRx
VS
Grade C · #193

MEDGm

Readers who want the dispensing pharmacies and the prescribing practices named, and who will price the second month rather than the first.

Visit MEDGm

The verdict

Winner · LunaRxGrade C vs C

LunaRx takes it, leading the Cost-Efficiency Index 63 to 60. LunaRx is a telehealth weight-loss platform advertising flat-rate pricing ($149/mo and $199/mo tiers) with a '$0 if not approved' consult guarantee. MEDGm still earns a CReaders who want the dispensing pharmacies and the prescribing practices named, and who will price the second month rather than the first.

Worth knowing either way: our overall #1 pick is CoreAge Rx (Cost-Efficiency Index 94/100 — the top of the ranking). See how it stacks up: CoreAge Rx vs LunaRx.

Factor by factor

Both providers scored on our six Cost-Efficiency Index factors. The stronger side on each row is marked in teal.

Normalized Cost/Month

70
41

Price Transparency

78
36

Nationwide Access

24
86

Formulation Options

66
77

Clinical Oversight

83
73

Contract Flexibility

55
67

Pricing, coverage & formulary

The disclosed facts behind the scores. Lower price wins its row (teal).

SpecLunaRxMEDGm
Cost-Efficiency Index63/10060/100
Semaglutide / mo$149/mo (compounded)$299/mo month-to-month (the advertised $179 is the first month only, after an automatically applied coupon)
Tirzepatide / mo$199/mo (compounded)$399/mo month-to-month (the advertised $279 is the first month only)
Semaglutide / yr (modeled)$1,788$3,588
Tirzepatide / yr (modeled)$2,388$4,788
CoverageCoverage not publishedAll 50 states
Oral / sublingualNoYes
Brand-name accessCompounded onlyCompounded only
Rank here#187#193

LunaRx

63/100

Where the value is

  • Advertises simple, flat-rate pricing with no hidden fees
  • '$0 if not approved' removes financial risk from a declined consult
  • Founder is publicly named (Anamaria Galvan, RN) rather than fully anonymous leadership

The tradeoffs

  • No named physician medical director -- only an RN founder is identified
  • No named compounding pharmacy partner
Visit LunaRx

Full LunaRx review →

MEDGm

60/100

Where the value is

  • Names all four pharmacy partners in its terms, with street addresses, phone numbers and websites, and says which compounding classes they operate under
  • Names seven prescribing professional corporations on its consent page rather than referring to an unnamed medical group
  • Publishes the full ladder for three GLP-1 routes — injection, oral tablet and tirzepatide — at one, three, six and twelve months

The tradeoffs

  • "Starting at $179" is a first-month rate produced by an automatically applied coupon; the standing month-to-month price is $299, and the same shape applies to the oral tablet and to tirzepatide
  • The treatments FAQ says "your price never increases" on a plan whose price increases by $120 at the first renewal
Visit MEDGm

Full MEDGm review →

Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. It never changes the Cost-Efficiency Index. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; prices change — confirm on the provider's site. Not medical advice. See our disclosure.

Keep comparing

← All head-to-head comparisons