Skip to content
WeighLab
Menu

Head-to-head · Cost-Efficiency Index

FlyteHealth vs FuturHealth

Two GLP-1 programs on the bench, scored on the same six factors. Here's how their real cost of ownership compares — and which one we'd start with.

Better valueGrade C · #473

FlyteHealth

Cost-first shoppers who want employers evaluating a metabolic-health benefit, not individual consumers shopping for GLP-1s directly.

Visit FlyteHealth
VS
Grade C · #474

FuturHealth

Cost-first shoppers who want want a bundled coaching-plus-medication membership rather than a bare-bones prescription-only service.

Visit FuturHealth

The verdict

Too close to callGrade C vs C

FlyteHealth and FuturHealth tie on the Cost-Efficiency Index at 44/100, so neither wins outright on the numbers. For most shoppers we'd start with FlyteHealth (ranked #473, a hair above #474) — Cost-first shoppers who want employers evaluating a metabolic-health benefit, not individual consumers shopping for GLP-1s directly. But FuturHealth is a genuine coin-flip alternative here.

Worth knowing either way: our overall #1 pick is CoreAge Rx (Cost-Efficiency Index 94/100 — the top of the ranking). See how it stacks up: CoreAge Rx vs FlyteHealth.

Factor by factor

Both providers scored on our six Cost-Efficiency Index factors. The stronger side on each row is marked in teal.

Normalized Cost/Month

45
45

Price Transparency

30
20

Nationwide Access

24
24

Formulation Options

40
69

Clinical Oversight

83
68

Contract Flexibility

55
55

Pricing, coverage & formulary

The disclosed facts behind the scores. Lower price wins its row (teal).

SpecFlyteHealthFuturHealth
Cost-Efficiency Index44/10044/100
Semaglutide / moNot disclosedNot disclosed
Tirzepatide / moNot disclosedNot disclosed
Semaglutide / yr (modeled)
Tirzepatide / yr (modeled)
CoverageCoverage not publishedCoverage not published
Oral / sublingualNoYes
Brand-name accessCompounded onlyYes
Rank here#473#474

FlyteHealth

44/100

Where the value is

  • Backed by named enterprise broker partners (Mercer, Aon, WTW, Gallagher)
  • Publishes clinical outcome data (avg. 15% weight loss at 24 months)
  • Combines GLP-1 and non-GLP-1 treatment pathways

The tradeoffs

  • No direct-to-consumer signup or individual pricing -- access requires an employer sponsor
  • No named medical director, pharmacy partner, or LegitScript badge found
Visit FlyteHealth

Full FlyteHealth review →

FuturHealth

44/100

Where the value is

  • Advertised starting price of $99/month is one of the lowest headline figures in the category
  • Bundles clinician guidance and a personalized nutrition plan into the membership rather than selling medication alone
  • Weight-loss guarantee: refunds the initial program fee if you follow the program and see no weight loss

The tradeoffs

  • The $99/month figure's scope is undisclosed — the site never states whether it includes the medication itself or is a platform fee with medication billed on top
  • No dosing tiers or per-medication (semaglutide vs. tirzepatide vs. brand-name) pricing is published anywhere on the public site
Visit FuturHealth

Full FuturHealth review →

Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. It never changes the Cost-Efficiency Index. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; prices change — confirm on the provider's site. Not medical advice. See our disclosure.

Keep comparing

← All head-to-head comparisons