Skip to content
WeighLab
Menu

Head-to-head · Cost-Efficiency Index

Effecty vs Eden

Two GLP-1 programs on the bench, scored on the same six factors. Here's how their real cost of ownership compares — and which one we'd start with.

Better valueGrade B · #14

Effecty

People who want competitive compounded pricing but also the option to step up to brand-name, verified and nationwide.

Visit Effecty
VS
Grade B · #15

Eden

People who will trade a higher sticker price for verified nationwide access and stronger clinical oversight.

Visit Eden

The verdict

Too close to callGrade B vs B

Effecty and Eden tie on the Cost-Efficiency Index at 86/100, so neither wins outright on the numbers. For most shoppers we'd start with Effecty (ranked #14, a hair above #15) — People who want competitive compounded pricing but also the option to step up to brand-name, verified and nationwide. But Eden is a genuine coin-flip alternative here.

Worth knowing either way: our overall #1 pick is CoreAge Rx (Cost-Efficiency Index 94/100 — the top of the ranking). See how it stacks up: CoreAge Rx vs Effecty.

Factor by factor

Both providers scored on our six Cost-Efficiency Index factors. The stronger side on each row is marked in teal.

Normalized Cost/Month

80
80

Price Transparency

86
90

Nationwide Access

96
96

Formulation Options

86
82

Clinical Oversight

88
92

Contract Flexibility

82
88

Pricing, coverage & formulary

The disclosed facts behind the scores. Lower price wins its row (teal).

SpecEffectyEden
Cost-Efficiency Index86/10086/100
Semaglutide / mo$160/mo$239/mo
Tirzepatide / mo$240/mo$349/mo
Semaglutide / yr (modeled)$1,920$2,868
Tirzepatide / yr (modeled)$2,880$4,188
CoverageAll 50 statesAll 50 states
Oral / sublingualNoNo
Brand-name accessYesCompounded only
Rank here#14#15

Effecty

86/100

Where the value is

  • Both molecules disclosed at competitive prices with all-50 access
  • Offers FDA-approved brand-name access alongside compounded
  • LegitScript-certified pharmacy

The tradeoffs

  • Per-month cost is mid-market, not budget-tier
  • No oral/sublingual option
Visit Effecty

Full Effecty review →

Eden

86/100

Where the value is

  • High transparency — clear supply-chain and clinician disclosure lowers hidden-cost risk
  • Nationwide availability with both molecules disclosed
  • Strong clinical oversight adds value beyond the raw price

The tradeoffs

  • Premium per-month cost drags its normalized value score
  • Compounded only — no brand-name access
Visit Eden

Full Eden review →

Regulatory note: the FDA issued a warning letter to Eden Health International Inc. dba Eden in June 2026. We still list and link to Eden; you should know the letter is on the public record before you decide.

Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. It never changes the Cost-Efficiency Index. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; prices change — confirm on the provider's site. Not medical advice. See our disclosure.

Keep comparing

← All head-to-head comparisons