Skip to content
WeighLab
Menu

Head-to-head · Cost-Efficiency Index

TeleHealth Med vs UR Meds

Two GLP-1 programs on the bench, scored on the same six factors. Here's how their real cost of ownership compares — and which one we'd start with.

Better valueGrade C · #443

TeleHealth Med

Shoppers willing to run the intake selector before seeing a price — public pricing isn't published.

Visit TeleHealth Med
VS
Grade C · #445

UR Meds

Cost-first shoppers who want low-cost, flat-priced GLP-1 plus other telehealth pillars in one place.

Visit UR Meds

The verdict

Too close to callGrade C vs C

TeleHealth Med and UR Meds tie on the Cost-Efficiency Index at 48/100, so neither wins outright on the numbers. For most shoppers we'd start with TeleHealth Med (ranked #443, a hair above #445) — Shoppers willing to run the intake selector before seeing a price — public pricing isn't published. But UR Meds is a genuine coin-flip alternative here.

Worth knowing either way: our overall #1 pick is CoreAge Rx (Cost-Efficiency Index 94/100 — the top of the ranking). See how it stacks up: CoreAge Rx vs TeleHealth Med.

Factor by factor

Both providers scored on our six Cost-Efficiency Index factors. The stronger side on each row is marked in teal.

Normalized Cost/Month

45
45

Price Transparency

54
54

Nationwide Access

24
24

Formulation Options

51
40

Clinical Oversight

68
78

Contract Flexibility

55
55

Pricing, coverage & formulary

The disclosed facts behind the scores. Lower price wins its row (teal).

SpecTeleHealth MedUR Meds
Cost-Efficiency Index48/10048/100
Semaglutide / moNot disclosedNot disclosed
Tirzepatide / moNot disclosedNot disclosed
Semaglutide / yr (modeled)
Tirzepatide / yr (modeled)
CoverageCoverage not publishedCoverage not published
Oral / sublingualYesNo
Brand-name accessCompounded onlyCompounded only
Rank here#443#445

TeleHealth Med

48/100

Where the value is

  • Publishes the FDA compounded-medication disclaimer and displays a LegitScript verification badge with a working verification link
  • Offers both injectable and sublingual (oral) forms of compounded GLP-1 — a real formulation choice most competitors don't have
  • Georgia corporate entity (TeleHealth Med, Inc.) is named, giving clearer legal accountability

The tradeoffs

  • No dollar figure appears anywhere on the public homepage or any subpage reached — pricing is generated only after completing an in-funnel medication/state selector
  • The site returns HTTP 403 to plain automated requests, making it unusually hard to verify pricing
Visit TeleHealth Med

Full TeleHealth Med review →

UR Meds

48/100

Where the value is

  • GLP-1 weight-loss care from $179/mo with the same price at every dose
  • No monthly membership; cancel anytime; no insurance required
  • Multi-pillar: also peptides, men's/women's health, hair, and longevity

The tradeoffs

  • Specific GLP-1 molecule (semaglutide vs tirzepatide) not named on the marketing site
  • Compounding pharmacy partner not named
Visit UR Meds

Full UR Meds review →

Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. It never changes the Cost-Efficiency Index. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; prices change — confirm on the provider's site. Not medical advice. See our disclosure.

Keep comparing

← All head-to-head comparisons